Court Decision on EPA Yucca Mountain Safety Standards - What Does It Mean? |
|
![]() |
HOME and other nonprofits were involved in a lawsuit challenging the EPA safety standards for the Yucca Mt. Repository for many reasons. This case was bundled with other cases filed by the state of Nevada, and even the Nuclear Energy Institute, a pro-nuclear group that wanted things to move faster. See news links below for more details and a wide range of responses. On Thursday, July 8th, 2004, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled against many of the issues involved. However, the court invalidated a key requirement that the repository be able to contain radioactive materials safely for at least 10,000 years, suggesting the period should be longer by possibly hundreds of thousands of years.
HOME's
Declaration in case. |
| 7/10/04 Las
Vegas Review Journal, Keith Rogers, "Scientists Differ.." 7/10/04 Las Vegas RJ, Steve Tetrault, "State Claims Court Win" Download the 100 page decision to read for
yourself at: |
See the graph, left, for
radionuclides that will not even begin their peak periods until after the
10,000 year period is over. HOME and others have long stated that the time
period was arbitrary and based more on the DOE's inability to model data
after that timeframe than any other reason. Actual exposure from drinking water would be much higher than EPA levels suggest. |