|
A Closer Look at One Example: Hanford Nuclear Reservation |
||
|
All DOE nuclear weapons facilities pose enormous risks to communities, aquifers, bioregions, etc. Let’s look closer at one example: the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Yakima country near Spokane, WA, and the Columbia River. Hanford houses nine reactors to produce plutonium. The PUREX plant reprocessed irradiated fuel rods for weapons parts. In the 40’s and 50’s, some 440 billion gallons of contaminated liquids were discharged into the ground at Hanford, enough to create an 80 foot deep lake the size of Manhattan. Discharges into the air spread over a multi-state area. In addition to wastes already in the biosphere, Hanford has dozens of tanks of unknown liquids that are leaking or poised to explode.
BNFL is the same firm under investigation in England for political dirty tricks, public endangerment (secretly parking nuke trains in residential areas), and gross mismanagement of the Sellafield reprocessing facility. Government secrecy has barred Hanford workers and residents alike from access to the real facts, appropriate health care, and a decent standard of living for decades. Until very recently, all concerns from citizen groups have been consistently discredited and side-lined. In April, 2000, a new study of workers at Hanford and three other DOE facilities confirmed that increasing exposure to ionizing radiation boosts the risk of multiple myeloma, a rare but often fatal cancer of blood-forming tissues. Especially at risk are people exposed later in life. |
|
|
|
Older workers with cumulative radiation doses of five rem or more were almost three-and-a-half times more likely to die from multiple myeloma than workers at the same plants whose cumulative exposures were less than one rem. The current full-body occupational limit for radiation workers, unchanged since 1961, is five rem per year, severely inadequate in view of these and other study results.** Despite all this, on April 20th, 2000, Congress approved an extra $9 million just for Hanford’s dubious Fast Flux Test Facility, in addition to its existing budget of $36.3 million for fiscal 2000. The DOE is conducting an environmental impact study to determine if the FFTF should be revived to produce medical isotopes, plutonium 238 for the space program and other research--or if it should be permanently shut down. *Alvarez R., "Energy in Decay", Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, May/June 2000, Vol. 56, No. 3, p. 28. ** Williamson D., "New Study Finds Multiple Myeloma Linked To Radiation Exposures Of Nuclear Workers", April 9, 2000, 919-962-8596. Exposure Study of Hanford Workers, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, January-February 2000, vol. 10, no. 1 pp. 27-35
|
||